|
6567b926212eaade2e0f6d76
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060810
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-AME-15150
|
1
|
Middle East, regional
|
Middle East
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.279612
|
0.279612
|
0
|
0
|
0.279612
|
0.279612
|
0
|
0.279612
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b926212eaade2e0f6d77
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060755
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-AME-15150
|
3
|
Middle East, regional
|
Middle East
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.204481
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.204481
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b926212eaade2e0f6d78
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060781
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-MMR-15150
|
1
|
Myanmar
|
South & Central Asia
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.22763
|
0.22763
|
0
|
0
|
0.22763
|
0.22763
|
0
|
0.22763
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b926212eaade2e0f6d79
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060726
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-MMR-15150
|
3
|
Myanmar
|
South & Central Asia
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.523574
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.523574
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b926212eaade2e0f6d7a
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060778
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-NIC-15150
|
1
|
Nicaragua
|
North & Central America
|
LMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.15205
|
0.15205
|
0
|
0
|
0.15205
|
0.15205
|
0
|
0.15205
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b927212eaade2e0f6d7b
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060723
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-NIC-15150
|
3
|
Nicaragua
|
Caribbean & Central America
|
LMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.161233
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.161233
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b927212eaade2e0f6d7c
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060770
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-PRY-15150
|
1
|
Paraguay
|
South America
|
LMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.231519
|
0.231519
|
0
|
0
|
0.231519
|
0.231519
|
0
|
0.231519
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b927212eaade2e0f6d7d
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060715
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-PRY-15150
|
3
|
Paraguay
|
South America
|
UMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.141245
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.141245
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b927212eaade2e0f6d7e
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060775
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-PER-15150
|
1
|
Peru
|
South America
|
UMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.207828
|
0.207828
|
0
|
0
|
0.207828
|
0.207828
|
0
|
0.207828
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b927212eaade2e0f6d7f
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060720
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-PER-15150
|
3
|
Peru
|
South America
|
UMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.431864
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.431864
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b928212eaade2e0f6d80
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060710
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-SOM-15150
|
3
|
Somalia
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.180864
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.180864
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b928212eaade2e0f6d81
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060762
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-SYD-15150
|
1
|
South America, regional
|
South America
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.43933
|
0.43933
|
0
|
0
|
0.43933
|
0.43933
|
0
|
0.43933
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b928212eaade2e0f6d82
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060707
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-SYD-15150
|
3
|
South America, regional
|
South America
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.670971
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.670971
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b928212eaade2e0f6d83
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060812
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-AEA-15150
|
1
|
South of Sahara, regional
|
South of Sahara
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.539363
|
0.539363
|
0
|
0
|
0.539363
|
0.539363
|
0
|
0.539363
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b929212eaade2e0f6d84
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060757
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-AEA-15150
|
3
|
Eastern Africa, regional
|
South of Sahara
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.863166
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.863166
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b929212eaade2e0f6d85
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060785
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-LKA-15150
|
1
|
Sri Lanka
|
South & Central Asia
|
LMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.295897
|
0.295897
|
0
|
0
|
0.295897
|
0.295897
|
0
|
0.295897
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b929212eaade2e0f6d86
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060730
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-LKA-15150
|
3
|
Sri Lanka
|
South & Central Asia
|
LMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.565135
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.565135
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b929212eaade2e0f6d87
|
2019
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016061176
|
SE-0-SE-6-5117007001-TZA-43010
|
3
|
Tanzania
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B04
|
0
|
7.93156
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
7.93156
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
PRODUCTIVE SOCIAL SAFETY NET (...PSSN)
more
|
Productive Social Safety Net (...PSSN)
more
|
The contribution is an additio...nal support to the implementation of Tanzania's Productive Social Safety Net (PSSN) program which aim at the poorest segment of the population. The additional financing is motivated by good results achieved so far, by a collaboration that works well, by an existing financing gap and by desirability to increase the incentive for Tanzania to contribute to the programme to a larger extent. The assessment that was made to underpin the decision on support in March 2016 is still largely valid. The program is nationwide and targets approximately one million households identified as extremely poor. Every two month households receive a fixed cash transfer that is adjusted to the household size. In addition to the fixed contribution, households can also receive an additional transfer that is conditional on children attending school and small children brought on regular visits to primary health care centres. PSSN also includes a public works component. During the agricultural lean season, when it is difficult to find temporary jobs, labour-intensive projects that in various ways contribute to the local communities' development are implemented (e.g. construction of class rooms and dams for irrigation). Only people belonging to the poorest households, i.e. those who are also eligible for the direct cash transfers, are eligible to participate in the public works projects.By design PSSN empowers women. The payment of both cash contributions and compensation for participation in public works are made to an adult woman in the household. Only in households where there is no adult woman the payment can be made to a man. In addition to the direct cash transfers and public works components, PSSN includes a livelihood component to help households develop productive activities in order to eventually be able to graduate from poverty.The contribution consists of three parts. First, a five-year financial contribution to the implementation of PSSN with an accompanying dialogue in accordance with the initial agreement. The second part is the additional financing which in all respects is design as the initial financing with the supplementary feature that the additional is linked to Tanzania's contribution to the program from the national budget. The additional financing will at the most reach the same level per Tanzania financial year as the initial contribution and thereby implies potential doubling of the Swedish contribution. An important goal of the contribution is for PSSN to become sustainable as an integral part of Tanzania's social protection system even after donor funding ceases. Therefore, PSSN's institutional sustainability is an important topic for the dialogue. Tanzania is in collaboration with the world bank performing a diagnostic public expenditure review of the structure and the financial sustainability of the social protection sector. Tanzania's ownership will be continuously monitored. For the initial contribution, a mid-term
more
|
not health relevant (TZA SE-0-...SE-6-5117007001-TZA-43010 Productive Social Safety Net (PSSN))
more
|
43010
|
Multisector aid
|
5.1;4.1;3.2;2.1;10.2;1.5;1.3;1
|
IV.2. Other Multisector
|
12000
|
Recipient Government
|
Tanzania Social Action Fund II...I-PSSN-DPS TASAF III Productive Social Safety Net
more
|
|
|
|
6567b929212eaade2e0f6d88
|
2017
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016061175
|
SE-0-SE-6-5117007002-TZA-43010
|
3
|
Tanzania
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D01
|
0
|
0.00558497
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.00558497
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
PRODUCTIVE SOCIAL SAFETY NET (...PSSN) - DONOR SECRETARIAT FM EXPERT
more
|
Productive Social Safety Net (...PSSN) - Donor Secretariat FM expert
more
|
The contribution is an additio...nal support to the implementation of Tanzania's Productive Social Safety Net (PSSN) program which aim at the poorest segment of the population. The additional financing is motivated by good results achieved so far, by a collaboration that works well, by an existing financing gap and by desirability to increase the incentive for Tanzania to contribute to the programme to a larger extent. The assessment that was made to underpin the decision on support in March 2016 is still largely valid. The program is nationwide and targets approximately one million households identified as extremely poor. Every two month households receive a fixed cash transfer that is adjusted to the household size. In addition to the fixed contribution, households can also receive an additional transfer that is conditional on children attending school and small children brought on regular visits to primary health care centres. PSSN also includes a public works component. During the agricultural lean season, when it is difficult to find temporary jobs, labour-intensive projects that in various ways contribute to the local communities' development are implemented (e.g. construction of class rooms and dams for irrigation). Only people belonging to the poorest households, i.e. those who are also eligible for the direct cash transfers, are eligible to participate in the public works projects.By design PSSN empowers women. The payment of both cash contributions and compensation for participation in public works are made to an adult woman in the household. Only in households where there is no adult woman the payment can be made to a man. In addition to the direct cash transfers and public works components, PSSN includes a livelihood component to help households develop productive activities in order to eventually be able to graduate from poverty.The contribution consists of three parts. First, a five-year financial contribution to the implementation of PSSN with an accompanying dialogue in accordance with the initial agreement. The second part is the additional financing which in all respects is design as the initial financing with the supplementary feature that the additional is linked to Tanzania's contribution to the program from the national budget. The additional financing will at the most reach the same level per Tanzania financial year as the initial contribution and thereby implies potential doubling of the Swedish contribution. An important goal of the contribution is for PSSN to become sustainable as an integral part of Tanzania's social protection system even after donor funding ceases. Therefore, PSSN's institutional sustainability is an important topic for the dialogue. Tanzania is in collaboration with the world bank performing a diagnostic public expenditure review of the structure and the financial sustainability of the social protection sector. Tanzania's ownership will be continuously monitored. For the initial contribution, a mid-term
more
|
not health relevant (TZA SE-0-...SE-6-5117007001-TZA-43010 Productive Social Safety Net (PSSN))
more
|
43010
|
Multisector aid
|
|
IV.2. Other Multisector
|
11001
|
Central Government
|
SIDA
|
|
|
|
6567b92a212eaade2e0f6d89
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016061174
|
SE-0-SE-6-5117007003-TZA-43010
|
1
|
Tanzania
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.876527
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.876527
|
0
|
0
|
0.876527
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
PRODUCTIVE SOCIAL SAFETY NET (...PSSN) - DONOR SECRETARIAT FM EXPERT LEKULE
more
|
Productive Social Safety Net (...PSSN) - Donor Secretariat FM expert Lekule
more
|
The contribution is an additio...nal support to the implementation of Tanzania's Productive Social Safety Net (PSSN) program aim at the poorest segment of the population. The additional financing is motivated by good results achieved so far, by a collaboration that works well, by an existing financing gap and by desirability to increase the incentive for Tanzania to contribute to the programme to a larger extent. The assessment that was made to underpin the decision on support in March 2016 is still largely valid. The program is nationwide and targets approximately one million households identified as extremely poor. Every two month households receive a fixed cash transfer that is adjusted to the household size. In addition to the fixed contribution, households can also receive an additional transfer that is conditional on children attending school and small children brought on regular visits to primary health care centres. PSSN also includes a public works component. During the agricultural lean season, when it is difficult to find temporary jobs, labour-intensive projects that in various ways contribute to the local communities' development are implemented (e.g. construction of class rooms and dams for irrigation). Only people belonging to the poorest households, i.e. those who are also eligible for the direct cash transfers, are eligible to participate in the public works projects.By design PSSN empowers women. The payment of both cash contributions and compensation for participation in public works are made to an adult woman in the household. Only in households where there is no adult woman the payment can be made to a man. In addition to the direct cash transfers and public works components, PSSN includes a livelihood component to help households develop productive activities in order to eventually be able to graduate from poverty.The contribution consists of three parts. First, a five-year financial contribution to the implementation of PSSN with an accompanying dialogue in accordance with the initial agreement. The second part is the additional financing which is all respects is design as the initial financing with the supplementary feature that the additional is linked to Tanzania's contribution to the program from the national budget. The additional financing will at the most reach the same level per Tanzania financial year as the initial contribution and thereby implies potential doubling of the Swedish contribution. An important goal of the contribution is for PSSN to become sustainable as an integral part of Tanzania's social protection system even after donor funding ceases. Therefore, PSSN's institutional sustainability is an important topic for the dialogue. Tanzania is in collaboration with the world bank performing a diagnostic public expenditure review of the structure and the financial sustainability of the social protection sector. Tanzania's ownership will be continuously monitored. For the initial contribution, a mid-term revie
more
|
not health relevant (TZA SE-0-...SE-6-5117007001-TZA-43010 Productive Social Safety Net (PSSN))
more
|
43010
|
Multisector aid
|
|
IV.2. Other Multisector
|
12000
|
Recipient government
|
TANZANIA SOCIAL ACTION FUND II...I-PSSN-DPS/TASAF III PRODUCTIVE SOCIAL SAFETY NET
more
|
|
|
|
6567b92a212eaade2e0f6d8a
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060760
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-THA-15150
|
1
|
Thailand
|
Far East Asia
|
UMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.135434
|
0.135434
|
0
|
0
|
0.135434
|
0.135434
|
0
|
0.135434
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b92a212eaade2e0f6d8b
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060705
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-THA-15150
|
3
|
Thailand
|
Far East Asia
|
UMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.506397
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.506397
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b92a212eaade2e0f6d8c
|
2018
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2015061585
|
SE-0-SE-6-5118009901-UGA-15170
|
3
|
Uganda
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
2.58331
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
2.58331
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
UN WOMEN UGANDA 2016-2018
|
UN Women Uganda 2016-2018
|
The Government of Uganda has m...ade significant progress in developing legal frameworks, policies and programmes which respect, protect and promote human rights and empowerment of women and girls. Progress, however, often remains at the policy level with implementation on the ground lacking behind due to inadequate capacity or priority in government institutions. As a result, women in Uganda continue to be marginalized and experience discrimination in in all spheres of life. Women's political participation and representation has progressed with women in Parliament increasing from 18% in 2000 to 35% in 2012; mainly owing to the Affirmative Action Policy. Women have also gained ground in Cabinet and Local Councils, yet party leadership and structures remain heavily male-dominated and patriarchal. Higher illiteracy and poverty levels among women compared to men mean that women are unable to compete on a level playing field in the highly monetized electoral process.Women's Economic Empowerment (WEE) constitutes another major obstacle to gender equality as well as to more overall development goals. Women have poor access to reproductive resources, and especially access to land and land tenure are areas of discrimination. Consequently, women struggle to access financial services including loans due to lack of collateral. Although 76% of Ugandan women are active in the labor market, women tend to concentrate in feminized occupations, clustering in low-value chains, part-time or informal employment. Violence against women and girls (VAWG) remains another main obstacle to the empowerment of women with the prevalence and social acceptance of VAWG consistently high. In addition, the link between WEE and VAWG is becoming increasingly apparent in Uganda. A great part of the violence reported at household level is economically motivated, with peaks around harvest periods.Finally, gender mainstreaming in peace building and humanitarian action is inadequate and often poorly coordinated. At the local level, heightened conflict over land in the Acholi region is exacerbated by discovery of oil in the Albertine region, and at the regional level, long-lasting conflicts in neighboring countries cause a continuing refugee influx to the northern and western parts of Uganda. Insecurity and humanitarian situations affect women and girls disproportionally, yet an effective coordination of gender issues in the security and humanitarian response is yet to be established.In response to the above situation analysis, the development intervention will provide core support to UN Women Uganda to implement the first three years (2016-2018) of its Strategic Note 2016-2020 with a total contribution of 66.5 M SEK (22 % of the total 5 year Strategic Note budget, 36% of the budget for the three years covered by the Agreement). UN Women established its country office in Uganda in 2010 (with a head office in Kampala and with district offices in Gulu and Moroto), and during her time of opera
more
|
|
15170
|
Women's equality organisations... and institutions
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
41146
|
United Nations Entity for Gend...er Equality and the Empowerment of Women
more
|
UNW/UNITED NATIONS WOMEN
|
|
|
|
6567b92a212eaade2e0f6d8d
|
2017
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2015061560
|
SE-0-SE-6-5118010001-UGA-15150
|
3
|
Uganda
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0
|
0.302378
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.302378
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
HIVOS FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION UG...ANDA
more
|
HIVOS Freedom of Expression Ug...anda
more
|
In recent years, Uganda has se...en an increase in restrictions on the freedoms of assembly, expression and association. While civil society has become more active, and the number of CSOs working on rights issues has increased, legislation has tightened and many organisations are finding it increasingly difficult to work on Freedom of Expression and rights issues. Media houses are strongly driven by political and/or private interests, and self-censorship is common. The right to information is secured in the Access to Information Act, which is relatively progressive for the region, but in practice things are different. This law is also inhibited by other legislation in place to regulate digital information and terrorism. Meanwhile, awareness among the population about human rights is low, and there is growing apathy towards both the state and civil society.HIVOS (Humanist Institute for Cooperation with Developing Countries) is a Dutch aid organisation that focuses on two areas: 'The Open Domain' aims to promote open and democratic societies; and 'The Green domain' promotes environmentally sustainable development. HIVOS operates in 26 countries through 700 partners, and has its headquarters in The Hague in the Netherlands. They have six regional offices around the world, including one in Nairobi for East Africa. HIVOS has a long experience of forwarding funds to, and building capacity and advocacy skills for its partners.HIVOS regional office for East Africa has submitted to the Embassy of the programme proposal 'Connecting Voices of Citizens to Promote and Protect Civic Spaces in Uganda 2016 - 2019'. The proposal is based on three thematic areas: a) the media, b) internet freedom and c) arts and culture incl. innovative media, and has four results areas:- Improved and sustained government responsiveness informed by Citizens;- Increased access to actionable quality information and data Citizen Engagement;- An inclusive creative industry as a viable sector to Promote Social Justice;- Protective Mechanisms in place for change agents at Risk (on-line and off-line).HIVOS has been operating in Uganda since 2007, but the new proposed programme is more ambitious. Its budget is estimated at MSEK 29 for the period 2015 - 2018. Sweden supports HIVOS already in other African countries, e g Zimbabwe and Tanzania.The Swedish strategy of Uganda has the aim to strengthen gender equality, democracy and respect for human rights, with a particular focus on increasing the capacity of civil society to promote human rights and citizens' opportunities to influence political processes and demand accountability.The Embassy's operationalisation plan has identified 'Access to Information and Means of Communication' as a focus area for addressing all four results areas of the Swedish strategy for Uganda. Traditional and new media are expected to highlight relevant issues and contribute to a vibrant debate on human rights, SRHR and gender equality. Increased access to informatio
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
21000
|
International NGOs
|
STICHTING HIVOS
|
|
|
|
6567b92b212eaade2e0f6d8e
|
2017
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060956
|
SE-0-SE-6-5211011801-PSE-13010
|
3
|
West Bank and Gaza Strip
|
Middle East
|
LMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0
|
1.14333
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1.14333
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
PALESTINE CENSUS 2017
|
Palestine Census 2017
|
Palestine Central Bureau of St...atistics PCBS is conducting a Population, Housing and establishment Census, PHC, which is the 3rd census in Palestinian Authority history, after 1997 & 2007. The UN recommends to conduct one every ten years. The preparatory phase started in January 2015, activities will be concluded by end of 2018. Total budget is $16,029,763. Sweden will contribute 20 MSEK in 2016, around 14%.***********************SUPPLEMENTARY DECISION - Delegated Cooperation / Co-financing with The NetherlandsThe Netherlands will fund the PHC through a silent partnership with Sweden, where Sweden is the Lead Donor and will administer the Dutch funds through a delegated cooperation Arrangement. The Netherlands will contribute SEK 9,500,000 in 2017.
more
|
|
13010
|
Population policy and administ...rative management
more
|
|
I.3. Population Policies/Progr...ammes & Reproductive Health
more
|
12000
|
Recipient government
|
PALESTINIAN CENTRAL BUREAU OF ...STATISTICS
more
|
|
|
|
6567b92b212eaade2e0f6d8f
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060767
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-PSE-15150
|
1
|
West Bank and Gaza Strip
|
Middle East
|
LMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.367571
|
0.367571
|
0
|
0
|
0.367571
|
0.367571
|
0
|
0.367571
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b92b212eaade2e0f6d90
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060712
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-PSE-15150
|
3
|
West Bank and Gaza Strip
|
Middle East
|
LMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.868431
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.868431
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b92b212eaade2e0f6d91
|
2016
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060758
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054101-ZWE-15150
|
1
|
Zimbabwe
|
South of Sahara
|
Other LICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.364343
|
0.364343
|
0
|
0
|
0.364343
|
0.364343
|
0
|
0.364343
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are: Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy) Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality) Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice) Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive c
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
DIAKONIA
|
|
|
|
6567b92b212eaade2e0f6d92
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060703
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-ZWE-15150
|
3
|
Zimbabwe
|
South of Sahara
|
Other LICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.568202
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.568202
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b92c212eaade2e0f6d93
|
2017
|
Sweden
|
The Swedish Research Council
|
2014291131
|
2014-3351
|
3
|
Africa, regional
|
Africa
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D02
|
0
|
0.0986311
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0986311
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
ADVANCING THE UNDERSTANDING ON... THE MAGNAPORTHE SPECIES-COMPLEX, RESISTANCE RESPONSES AND CROPPING SYSTEMS WITH EMPHASIS ON FINGER MILLET
more
|
Advancing the understanding on... the Magnaporthe species-complex, resistance responses and cropping systems with emphasis on finger millet
more
|
Finger millet is an African na...tive adapted cereal with high nutrient values and drought hardiness that is threatened by the blast fungal disease by Magnaporthe. This project is divided in three parts. 1. Diseased finger-millet materials will be collected in East Africa together with infected wild grasses. Fungal DNA will be used to clarify prevalent Magnaporthe species, something that is unknown, via sequencing loci used for earlier phylogenetic groupings. Next step is to select isolates for genome re-sequencing based on deviating phylogeny and host interactions. DNA/RNA will be prepared and send for sequencing at SciLifeLab. The data will give us evolutionary information but most importantly knowledge on effector disease-promoting proteins that differ between continents and plant hosts. 2. Here we plan to develop an effector-screen to monitor finger-millet collections in order to characterize specific host responses. This approach lays the basis of a new optimized use of genetic resources in finger-millet breeding aiming to achieve durable resistance in the new varieties. In parallel new finger millet genotypes will be collected, evaluated, and passed over to ongoing traditional breeding initiatives. 3. We plan to set up and evaluate a mixed cropping system with legumes. This approach aims at further reducing the Magnaporthe population, selection pressure and weeds, improve soil fertility, and generate added values by growing improved and highly nutritious crops.
more
|
|
31182
|
Agricultural research
|
|
III.1.a. Agriculture
|
51000
|
University, college or other t...eaching institution, research institute or think-tank
more
|
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
|
|
|
|
6567b92c212eaade2e0f6d94
|
2017
|
Sweden
|
The Swedish Research Council
|
2014292516
|
2014-3481
|
3
|
Africa, regional
|
Africa
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D02
|
0
|
0.0939511
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0939511
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
ELECTRO-OPTICAL REMOTE SENSING... OF INSECTS FOR TROPICAL DEVELOPMENT
more
|
Electro-optical remote sensing... of insects for tropical development
more
|
We apply for a PhD position in... engineering physics, for the purpose of further development and field use of recently developed optical tools for remote insect monitoring. At least one tropical field campaign and one Swedish field campaign will be conducted each year. The focus of the campaigns will be on local problems in relation to insect transmitted diseases and agricultural pests, in collaboration with Swedish and local researchers. The 1-3 weeks field campaigns are followed by data evaluation, planning and improvement. During the campaigns the instrumentation, consisting of telescopes and compact diode lasers, is translated out in the natural habitat of insects. The systems are calibrated using spheres, controlled insect releases and stereo vision. Remotely recorded signals either arise from scattered sunlight or backscattered laser radiation. Sensors include spectrometers, quadrant detectors, linear and imaging CCDs. The information retrieved can include species, gender, age, position, heading, or payload. Data are evaluated with frequency analysis and chemometric methods. The project will contribute to the understanding of insect dispersal on landscape scales, which can diminish malaria and invasive agricultural pests. The improved monitoring tools and measures can improve living for the low-income rural population. The project will involve local African scientists for local continuation and will promote applied science for the benefit of the local society.
more
|
|
43082
|
Research/scientific institutio...ns
more
|
|
IV.2. Other Multisector
|
51000
|
University, college or other t...eaching institution, research institute or think-tank
more
|
Lunds universitet
|
|
|
|
6567b92c212eaade2e0f6d95
|
2019
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2013060062
|
SE-0-SE-6-5102013302-ASI-41010
|
3
|
Asia, regional
|
Asia
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0
|
0.134876
|
0.0101212
|
0
|
0
|
0.134876
|
0.0101212
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
KEMI REGIONAL AGRIC. CHEMICALS... PROG. 13-18
more
|
KemI Regional Agric. Chemicals... prog. 13-18
more
|
The overall goal of this progr...amme is: Health and environmental risk reduction through capacity building for the proper management, and sustainable use, of agricultural and industrial chemicals.
more
|
|
41010
|
Environmental policy and admin...istrative management
more
|
6.3;5.5;2.1;17.9;16.5;15.5;14.
|
IV.1. General Environment Prot...ection
more
|
11000
|
Donor Government
|
Kemikalieinspektionen
|
|
|
|
6567b92c212eaade2e0f6d96
|
2019
|
Sweden
|
The Swedish Research Council
|
20160290081
|
2015-03279
|
3
|
Bangladesh
|
South & Central Asia
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D02
|
0
|
0.0951787
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0951787
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
SOURCE DETERMINATION OF BLACK ...CARBON AEROSOLS IN BANGLADESH: PRIORITIZED SHORT-LIVED CLIMATE POLLUTANTS
more
|
Source Determination of Black ...Carbon Aerosols in Bangladesh: Prioritized Short-Lived Climate Pollutants
more
|
Aerosol pollution containing B...lack Carbon (BC; soot) fills the atmosphere of S Asia. This Atmospheric Brown Cloud (ABC), with BC as a key component, cause severe effects on both the regional climate and the quality of the air people breathe, yet the relative source contributions from e.g. biomass vs fossil fuel combustion are poorly constrained. Atmospheric BC from biomass vs fossil fuel combustion have different intrinsic impacts on climate and health; fossil-BC have stronger mass-normalized solar absorption efficiency and is smaller in size, thus able to penetrate further into the lungs. Hence, it is imperative to reduce uncertainties regarding BC sources and emissions. Unfortunately, bottom-up technology-based emission inventories (EI) – the common input for models of climate and air quality and a policy tool for mitigation decisions – has large uncertainties in BC sources and emissions, with predictions ranging by factors 3-5.This project will further develop and apply microscale 14C-dating of BC aerosols to provide powerful observation-based top-down information on the relative contribution from combustion of fossil fuel (extinct 14C) and biomass (contemporary 14C) to the BC in the actual atmosphere.Our initial month-long studies have demonstrated systematic underestimation in the fractional fossil contribution of all 8 BC-EI for India (Gustafsson et al., 2009 Science) and in all 12 BC-EI for China (Chen et al., incl Gustafsson, 2013). In collaboration with aerosol researchers in Bangladesh, one of the most polluted regions on Earth and the exhaust pipe of S Asia, we propose the first year-round 14C-BC source forensics assessment for S Asia. Building on recent Swe-Bangla pilot study, we propose 24-mo BC source apportionment campaigns in both highly-polluted megacity Dhaka and in rural southern Bangladesh at the newly established Bhola Observatory (now part of the international UNEP-ABC program set of receptor observatories). This site provides an opportunity to source fingerprint the load of BC that have accumulated through the Pakistan – N India – Bangladesh air transport; it thus provides an integrated perspective of sources to the BC influencing the larger-scale regional climate. The three objectives and approaches are:(1)14C-based quantification of the relative contribution of biomass vs fossil fuel combustion to BC in megacity Dhaka and regional receptor site Bhola. Benefit: Pinning down the sources of BC aerosols in S Asia allows us to better understand its effects on climate, respiratory health and to guide policy options toward mitigation.(2)Assimilate a battery of diagnostic source markers (?14C, d13C and pyrogenic molecules) to refine apportionment of multiple sources. Benefit: Statistical modeling of the generated source-diagnostic database with Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations will yield an improved description of BC sources to the polluted air over Bangladesh between fossil-liquid, fossil-coal, biomass-woodfuel, bi
more
|
|
41082
|
Environmental research
|
15.1;13
|
IV.1. General Environment Prot...ection
more
|
51000
|
University, college or other t...eaching institution, research institute or think-tank
more
|
Stockholms universitet
|
|
|
|
6567b92c212eaade2e0f6d97
|
2018
|
Sweden
|
The Swedish Research Council
|
20160290056
|
2015-05897
|
3
|
Bangladesh
|
South & Central Asia
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D02
|
0
|
0.0448771
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0448771
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DEVELOPMENT OF UDDER HEALTH CO...NTROL PROGRAM IN DAIRY COWS IN BANGLADESH
more
|
Development of Udder Health Co...ntrol Program in dairy cows in Bangladesh
more
|
Small scale dairying is import...ant for the rural economy, especially for marginalized poor people, primarily women. Mastitis (inflammation of the udder gland) is a common, but complex problem in dairy cows and causes considerable losses. Therefore, reducing the burden of disease of mastitis asks for a systematic, science-based approach. The purpose of this 3 year project is to create a sustainable multidisciplinary collaboration between researchers from Bangladesh, France, the Netherlands and Sweden. With this team, we aim to develop an udder health control program (UHCP) that is tailored to the dairy situation in Bangladesh. We will use the existing scientific literature and consult international mastitis experts, to evaluate the currently available mastitis control measures for use in the dairy sector in Bangladesh. Any gaps in the available knowledge will be filled by collecting relevant field data. We will organize a scientific workshop to collect relevant information and a practical workshop to disseminate the UHCP within the Bangladesh veterinary community. This collaborative project contributes to more sustainable and profitable dairy farming in Bangladesh and thus to poverty alleviation, but also serves as an example of a systematic, evidence-based approach for animal disease control in a developing country. We anticipate that this project will strengthen and expand our network, creating a sound basis for future collaborative research efforts.
more
|
|
31182
|
Agricultural research
|
|
III.1.a. Agriculture
|
51000
|
University, college or other t...eaching institution, research institute or think-tank
more
|
Statens Veterinärmedicinska A...nstalt, SVA
more
|
|
|
|
6567b92d212eaade2e0f6d98
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2017060498A
|
SE-0-SE-6-5217004001-BGD-14031
|
3
|
Bangladesh
|
South & Central Asia
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.705778
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.705778
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
WATER SAFETY FOR THE WELLBEING... OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN IN BANGLADESH
more
|
Water Safety for the wellbeing... of Women and Children in Bangladesh
more
|
The intervention is considered... to deliver sustainable results that contributes to the Results strategy for Bangladesh has made significant progress in increasing access to improved drinking water in both urban and rural areas, and to all segments of the population. As a result of this, Bangladesh achieved the Millennium Development Goal 7c related to drinking water well before the end date in 2015 and currently 98% of the population enjoys access to a protected drinking water source (JMP, 2015). However, looking past the quality proxy of improved water source reveals that the water supply is undermined by quality issues and unreliable service provision (MICS 2009). According to the most recent Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey, MICS, only 35 % of households consume water which meets the Bangladesh standard for both arsenic and bacteriological contamination. WHO estimate that chronic arsenic exposure leads to 43 000 deaths annually having a significant economic impact on the country. Despite improvements in prevention and treatment of waterborne disease, 15% of post-neonatal deaths all 6% of all U5 deaths are currently due to diarrhea. Arsenic contamination of shallow wells has been a recognized problem since the 1990s but, despite large investments by donors and government, the result has only been a decrease in exposure of 1%, which actually translates into an increased number of affected people given the population growth during the same period. Several factors contribute to this limited success and water quality issues in general, but at the core lay weak regulation and accountability, poor information management, and a lack of capacity of government to coordinate and engage with small scale entrepreneurs in the water sector. The proposed programme will support the government of Bangladesh to lead, coordinate and facilitate the implementation and management of water safety frameworks and protocols. The long term development goal is universal access to safe and sustainable drinking water and the expected outcomes of the project are:1. By 2020, roles and responsibilities for regulation, capacity building, service provision and water quality testing are assigned. 2. By 2020, harmonized systems and procedures are deployed by stakeholders for the delivery of arsenic and bacteriologically safe drinking water.3. By 2020, evidence-based systems are used by accountable stakeholders in the health and drinking water sub-sectors.
more
|
0
|
14031
|
Basic drinking water supply
|
6.2,6.1
|
I.4. Water Supply & Sanitation
|
41122
|
United Nations Children's Fund
|
UNICEF/United Nations Children...'s Fund
more
|
|
|
|
6567b92d212eaade2e0f6d99
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060747
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-BGD-43040
|
3
|
Bangladesh
|
South & Central Asia
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.046809
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.046809
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
43040
|
Rural development
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
IV.2. Other Multisector
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b92d212eaade2e0f6d9a
|
2019
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016061557
|
SE-0-SE-6-10187A0102-BOL-14030
|
3
|
Bolivia
|
South America
|
LMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0
|
0
|
0.0238727
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0238727
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
BOLIVIA SUSTAINABLE SANITATION... MODELS
more
|
Bolivia Sustainable Sanitation... Models
more
|
The programme will develop mod...els for sustainable sanitation in selected municipalities in Bolivia: (i) Systems with ecological dry toilets and closing of the nutrient cycle through re-use of waste as fertilizers in agriculture; (ii) Alternative systems for waste water treatment with the potential for re-use of treated waste water for irrigation. The Programme is based on previous successfully implemented pilot projects in the country. Cooperation partners are the Swedish NGO Diakonia and two Bolivian NGOs: the AguaTuya and Sumaj Huasi foundations. In total 25 000 people will gain access to sanitation through the Programme. The models developed are expected to have the potential to be implemented nationwide at a later stage and contribute to the Bolivian governments plan to provide universal access to sanitation by 2025. In Bolivia today, 50% of the population or 5 million people lack access to safe sanitation. The Programme is expected to contribute to the SDG 6.
more
|
|
14030
|
Basic drinking water supply an...d basic sanitation
more
|
6.2
|
I.4. Water Supply & Sanitation
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b92e212eaade2e0f6d9b
|
2017
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2017061108A
|
SE-0-SE-6-11144A0101-BIH-41010
|
1
|
Bosnia and Herzegovina
|
Europe
|
UMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D02
|
0.012285
|
0.01207
|
0
|
0
|
0.012285
|
0.01207
|
0
|
0.012285
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
EXTERNAL EVALUATION OF DESIGN ...BIHAC HOSPITAL - PDF 2017
more
|
External evaluation of design ...Bihac hospital - PDF 2017
more
|
- To examine and analyze the D...esign Documentation including technical specifications, drawings and Bill of Quantity which was prepared by local design company.- To provide external opinion on:Soundness of the Design. Whether design is line with the techni
more
|
|
41010
|
Environmental policy and admin...istrative management
more
|
|
IV.1. General Environment Prot...ection
more
|
90000
|
Other
|
Other
|
|
|
|
6567b92e212eaade2e0f6d9c
|
2017
|
Sweden
|
The Swedish Research Council
|
2014292530
|
2014-4293
|
3
|
Botswana
|
South of Sahara
|
UMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D02
|
0
|
0.028665
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.028665
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
EMERGING VIRUS INFECTIONS IN T...HE WILDLIFE-LIVESTOCK-HUMAN INTERFACE: UNDERSTANDING THE EPIDEMIOLOGY AND SOCIOECONOMIC IMPACT OF PESTE DES PETITS RUMIN
more
|
Emerging virus infections in t...he wildlife-livestock-human interface: Understanding the epidemiology and socioeconomic impact of Peste des petits rumin
more
|
PPR is an economically importa...nt disease, especially affecting the household economy of the poorest people. Domestic sheep and goats are species important for the daily survival of the rural poor in Africa, and also the main hosts of the disease. The overall purpose of the proposed 3-year project is to broaden and strengthen the collaboration between a multidisciplinary team of researchers from Sweden, Botswana, Tanzania and France by bringing together expertise in veterinary virology, rural development and infection epidemiology. The proposed project will include a broader view of the impact of PPR posing a serious threat to the development and sustainability of small livestock production in southern Africa. Small livestock is of particular importance for the livelihoods of poor rural farmers, and it is therefore important to assess the socioeconomic impact of PPR to understand how poor groups are affected. This assessment will be performed through livelihoods analysis. The risk related to PPR emergence and spread further to south, in previously PPRV-free countries such as Botswana, will be analyzed and assessed. Mutual knowledge and technology needed for long-term research partnerships on PPRV and other infectious small livestock diseases will be built up through research visits between partners and joint workshops. Better understanding of the effects of the disease will also create the networks and fundamentals needed for preparation of collaborative research proposals.
more
|
|
31182
|
Agricultural research
|
|
III.1.a. Agriculture
|
51000
|
University, college or other t...eaching institution, research institute or think-tank
more
|
Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet
|
|
|
|
6567b92e212eaade2e0f6d9d
|
2017
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2017060803A
|
SE-0-SE-6-5120004401-BFA-31140
|
1
|
Burkina Faso
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
2.808
|
2.808
|
0
|
0
|
2.808
|
2.808
|
0
|
2.808
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
PROVALAB/AGRICULTURAL VALORIZA...TION OF SMALL DAMS IN BURKINA FASO
more
|
ProValAB/Agricultural valoriza...tion of small dams in Burkina Faso
more
|
The project aims to assure an ...improved agricultural valorization of hydraulic infrastructure already in place in Burkina Faso. The project aims at both rehabilitating 17 to 20 of Burkina Faso's many water dams and improve the use of the dams. The overall expected objective of the project is: 'Households sustainable development of food security/nutritional security and increase of their incomes by exploiting water from small dams through the development of beneficial value chains'.The specific objectives are : • users put in place good governance for the sustainable management of infrastructures, water resources and developed lands;• farmers increase quantitatively and qualitatively their agricultural, forestry, pastoral and fishery production (ASPF) ;• producers and other players in value chains improve their economic and social performance.The project runs in its totality over 5 years, where a first phase (2017-2020) is financed in collaboration between the Government of Burkina Faso and Sweden. Sweden contributes XX million SEK.The contribution is is in line with the following goal of the strategy for Sweden's development cooperation in Burkina Faso '... to help boost incomes and improve security among the poor, especially amongwomen and girls, by promoting environmentally sustainable increases in productivity inthe natural resource management sectors.' Further, the contribution is of a vital importance for Burkina Faso's capacity to adapt to climate change.The project contributes to at least eight of the seventeen sustainable goals stated by the United Nation in 2015 and signed both by Sweden and Burkina Faso. It is also in coherence with several public policy objectives of Burkina Faso such as the National Plan for Economic and Social Development (NPESD) adopted in 2016 and the development strategy SCADD. It is further in line with the National Adaptation Program of Action on Climate Change (NAPA). ProValAB falls within the framework of the implementation of the National Water Policy by considering the National Program for Integrated Water Resources Management and the National Hydro Development.In Burkina Faso around 85% of the population gain their living from natural resources, agriculture, livestock and silviculture. This is more so in the rural areas where the incomes are very low, however these livelihood activities still contributes to around 40% of the Gross Domestic Budget (GDP). The most limiting factor to increase the productivity of natural resources is the access to water. With climate change the rainfall have become more irregular and more intense once it occurs, which means that the risk of soil erosion increases, that the topsoil disappears and the possibility to keep the humidity in the soil diminish. The dams allow farmers to produce an important supplement of vegetables and fruits, which in addition will increase their cash income and make them more market-oriented. It should also improve nutrition and health status of the f
more
|
|
31140
|
Agricultural water resources
|
|
III.1.a. Agriculture
|
12000
|
Recipient government
|
Government of Burkina Faso
|
|
|
|
6567b92e212eaade2e0f6d9e
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060751
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-BFA-43040
|
3
|
Burkina Faso
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.060254
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.060254
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
43040
|
Rural development
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
IV.2. Other Multisector
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b92e212eaade2e0f6d9f
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060750
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-BFA-43081
|
3
|
Burkina Faso
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.064241
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.064241
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
43081
|
Multisector education/training
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
IV.2. Other Multisector
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b92f212eaade2e0f6da0
|
2018
|
Sweden
|
The Swedish Research Council
|
20160290097
|
2015-03094
|
3
|
Burundi
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D02
|
0
|
0.138083
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.138083
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DISCIPLINING FIGHTERS: UNDERST...ANDING ARMED POLITICAL ACTORS' CONTROL OF SEXUAL VIOLENCE
more
|
Disciplining Fighters: Underst...anding Armed Political Actors' Control of Sexual Violence
more
|
The ways that armed political ...actors prevent sexual violence remains an unresolved research puzzle. By questioning why some actors are able to discipline their fighters, this study will contribute to our wider understanding of the direct and indirect internal factors that lead to wartime rape, sexual exploitation and similar abuses.The project will explore the causes of control of sexual violence among different non-state armed political actors – Palipehutu-FNL i Burundi; Folkets befrielsearmé i Namibia (PLAN), armén av SWAPO, South West African Folkets Organisation; och Uganda National Resistance Army / rörelse (NRA / M). Despite their different histories and geo-political contexts; their diverse political circumstances; and their dissimilar cultural contexts, these actors managed to control the sexual violence behavior of their members. The project's data collection techniques include focus group research with former members of FNL, PLAN/SWAPO and NRA/M. By investigating these armed political actors' disciplinary practices, the project will advance the possibility for arriving at a general theory of armed group control of sexual violence.
more
|
|
43082
|
Research/scientific institutio...ns
more
|
|
IV.2. Other Multisector
|
51000
|
University, college or other t...eaching institution, research institute or think-tank
more
|
Uppsala universitet
|
|
|
|
6567b92f212eaade2e0f6da1
|
2019
|
Sweden
|
The Swedish Research Council
|
20170290036
|
2016-05678
|
3
|
Cambodia
|
Far East Asia
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D02
|
0
|
0.0412441
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0412441
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
HEALTH SYSTEM RESILIENCE AND F...LOODING IN CAMBODIA: DEVELOPING THE EVIDENCE
more
|
Health system resilience and f...looding in Cambodia: Developing the evidence
more
|
Cambodia is a low-income count...ry where flooding is predicted to become more intense and frequent as climate change continues. Health systems in resource scarce settings are less resilient to absorb the shocks of disasters, leading to erosion of health system capacities. The purpose of this project is to build on an ongoing research collaboration between the NIPH and KI is to support and strengthen institutional capacities in research, education, response and policy dialogue. Between 2017 and 2019, we aim to explore the health and health system effects of flooding in Cambodia and factors that may strengthen health system resilience, by identifying morbidities and risk factors for changes in health service delivery during flood periods. We also aim to expand and provide support to the current NIPH education and training programs and build capacity for response and policy dialogue, aligned with the Cambodia disaster response system, through teacher exchanges and research-related workshops and group meetings. Improving capacity will lead to Cambodia's improved preventative and resilience capabilities in upcoming disasters. Both institutions will benefit from the knowledge generation, and individual researchers and students will gain from the educational and supervisory opportunities and the application of skills and training.
more
|
|
12182
|
Medical research
|
3.b;13
|
I.2.a. Health, General
|
51000
|
University, college or other t...eaching institution, research institute or think-tank
more
|
Karolinska Institutet
|
|
|
|
6567b92f212eaade2e0f6da2
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060734
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-KHM-43081
|
3
|
Cambodia
|
Far East Asia
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.027196
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.027196
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
43081
|
Multisector education/training
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
IV.2. Other Multisector
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b930212eaade2e0f6da3
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2016060742
|
SE-0-SE-6-5403054102-COL-15220
|
3
|
Colombia
|
South America
|
UMICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
B03
|
0
|
0.054869
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.054869
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
DIAKONIA FRAME 2016-2020
|
Diakonia frame 2016-2020
|
This programme is implemented ...during a five-year period (as framework organizations may now apply for grants for longer periods than in the past in order to increase aid effectiveness) and it is based on Diakonia's global strategy for 2015-2020. It includes 21 country programs in Africa, Asia, Latin America and the Middle East, and six regional programs and a new global program for innovation in the area of social and economic justice. Diakonia is working through local civil society organizations for the overall goal to change unfair structures that generate and uphold inequality, oppression and violence and to work for fulfilment of the right of all people to live a life in dignity. In total 216 partner organizations are included in this application. Operations are focused on the following six areas: human rights (HR), democracy, equality, social and economic justice, conflict and justice, as well as capacity development of partners. What is new compared to the previous contribution is primarily the inclusion of several new regional programs in various areas as well as the global innovation program.Expected results:General expected results are formulated for the six areas. These are linked to the expected results for each program (i.e. by country / regional / global program), which in many cases consist of a selection of results that are identical to the general results. The results at the program level are concretized through indicators.Examples of expected outcomes, one from each region, in some common thematic areas are:Mali: Women's political participation has been strengthened at the local and national levels (democracy)Bolivia: Gender-based violence has decreased (gender equality)Bangladesh: The conditions for decent work and fair income have improved (social and economic justice)Lebanon: The capacity of Diakonia's partners to integrate environment and conflict sensitivity in their work (where relevant) has been improved. (capacity development)Previous results:Reports often show results in terms of strengthened rights holders and increased capacity of partner organizations.The following examples show previous results in a few areas:Human rights: In Thailand five partner organizations assisted tens of thousands of stateless persons to obtain legal status. This means that they for example have the right to work and study, as well as to access rights-based services.Democracy: In Mali, partner organizations were trained in citizen budget monitoring and analysis of public policies. This has led to increased budgets for health and education in several municipalities. In one province all municipalities published their accounting in 2014, whereas in 2012 none of the municipalities did.Conflict and Justice: Seven partner organizations in Colombia, Honduras and Peru have increased their knowledge of the legal framework and have taken legal action, which in some cases resulted in the return to communities of pieces of land from extractive companies.T
more
|
0
|
15220
|
Civilian peace-building, confl...ict prevention and resolution
more
|
5.6,5.1,3.7,2.1,16.6,16.3,16.1...0,1.5,1.4,1.1
more
|
I.5.b. Conflict, Peace & Secur...ity
more
|
22000
|
Donor country-based NGO
|
Diakonia
|
|
|
|
6567b930212eaade2e0f6da4
|
2017
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2017061110A
|
SE-0-SE-6-11142A0101-PRK-15150
|
1
|
Democratic People's Republic o...f Korea
more
|
Far East Asia
|
Other LICs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0.0586973
|
0.0166554
|
0
|
0
|
0.0586973
|
0.0166554
|
0
|
0.0586973
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
FORUM SYD EU-NORTH KOREA 2017-...2020 RED CROSS
more
|
Forum Syd EU-North Korea 2017-...2020 Red Cross
more
|
Improved nutritional status th...rough improved technical capacity in civil society in the Democratic People's Repblic of Korea (DPRK).
more
|
|
15150
|
Democratic participation and c...ivil society
more
|
|
I.5.a. Government & Civil Soci...ety-general
more
|
22000
|
National NGOs
|
FORUM SYD
|
|
|
|
6567b930212eaade2e0f6da5
|
2020
|
Sweden
|
Swedish International Developm...ent Authority
more
|
2017060795A
|
SE-0-SE-6-5125003101-COD-12240
|
3
|
Democratic Republic of the Con...go
more
|
South of Sahara
|
LDCs
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
C01
|
0
|
0.272909
|
0
|
0
|
|
0.272909
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
RESILIENCE TO CHILD MALNUTRITI...ON ACF DRC 2017-2020 - RESILIENCE TO CHILD MALNUTRITION
more
|
Resilience to child malnutriti...on ACF DRC 2017-2020 - Resilience to child malnutrition
more
|
To prevent child malnutrition ...in Kalomba health zone, DRC, Kasaï Central, during 2017-2020, through water and sanitation, nutrition and support to livelihoods, and by mainstreaming gender and environment. Linked to a previous humanitarian support in 2014-2017.
more
|
0
|
12240
|
Basic nutrition
|
6.2,3.2,2.1
|
I.2.b. Basic Health
|
21000
|
International NGO
|
ACF/Action Contre la Faim, Fra...nce
more
|
|
|
|
6567b930212eaade2e0f6da6
|
2018
|
Sweden
|
The Swedish Research Council
|
20160290082
|
2015-03344
|
3
|
Developing countries, unspecif...ied
more
|
Regional and Unspecified
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D02
|
0
|
0.103563
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.103563
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
CAPTURE AND IMMOBILIZATION OF ...POLLUTANTS IN WASTEWATER IN AFRICA USING BIOCHAR FROM LOCAL CROP RESIDUES
more
|
Capture and immobilization of ...pollutants in wastewater in Africa using biochar from local crop residues
more
|
This research project will foc...us on use of wastewater in agriculture, and how to prevent the environmental and health-related risks associated with such use in countries with water scarcity. We will particularly address the occurrence and removal of micro-pollutants in the wastewater, by use of two different removal methodologies; (i) barrier-enhanced small-scale decentralized wastewater treatment systems (so called DEWATS), and (ii) soil amendments applied on top of the soil or mixed with the top layer of soil. In both methodologies biochar produced from local crop residues will be used as adsorbent material to capture and immobilize pollutants present in the wastewater. This research is of high relevance to a large number of the world's least developed countries suffering from water scarcity, particularly in Africa. As study objects in this project we have selected Tanzania and Morocco, which represents two African countries with high water stress, but with different geographical/topographical conditions.The main objective is to demonstrate the function of biochar produced from carbonization of low-cost and locally available crop residues as adsorbent material in an established water purification set-up, such as the DEWATS plant. We will also explore the potential for application directly on soil for on-site capture and immobilisation of pollutants in wastewater used for agricultural irrigation. Both approaches will demand a detailed characterization of the biochar adsorbent and an evaluation of their adsorption behavior. Finally, we will study optimization of the biochar adsorbents by use of additives (pottery sherds and charcoal ash). The goal in a longer perspective is to aid in providing a sustainable solution which promotes human health as well as environmental protection.The specific goals are to investigate: i) the removal efficiency of different biochars with regard to the most common pollutants; ii) how the material composition and material properties of the crop residues affect the adsorption capacity of the resulting biochar; iii) how the adsorption capacity may be improved by use of additives; and iv) how the choice of removal methodology affects the removal efficiency of the studied pollutants.The project will be conducted during a period of three years by researchers at Umeå University (Sweden) and United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), and by local collaboration partners in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania, and Rabat, Morocco.
more
|
|
41082
|
Environmental research
|
|
IV.1. General Environment Prot...ection
more
|
51000
|
University, college or other t...eaching institution, research institute or think-tank
more
|
Umeå universitet
|
|
|
|
6567b930212eaade2e0f6da7
|
2019
|
Sweden
|
The Swedish Research Council
|
20170290008
|
2016-05615_1
|
3
|
Developing countries, unspecif...ied
more
|
Regional and Unspecified
|
Part I unallocated by income
|
ODA Grants
|
1
|
10
|
110
|
D02
|
0
|
0.0581647
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0.0581647
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Classified as not health-speci...fic activity
more
|
|
100
|
EVALUATING INNOVATIVE PROGRAMS... TO COMBAT CHILD AND MATERNAL MORTALITY IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: EVIDENCE FROM THREE LARGE-SCALE PROJECTS IN UGANDA AND
more
|
Evaluating innovative programs... to combat child and maternal mortality in developing countries: Evidence from three large-scale projects in Uganda and
more
|
Despite large improvements in ...under-five child mortality in recent decades, an estimated 6.9 million children die from preventable diseases every year. A majority of these deaths occur in the poorest countries in the world, in areas of underserved populations with inadequate access to health services. This dramatic picture calls for urgent attention. This research program aims to implement and study three innovative projects to improve child and maternal health outcomes in the Sub-Saharan Africa - the region where change is most desperately needed. The first part of this research program, experiments and evaluates two complementary approaches to the government system to ensure that basic health care is delivered to poor families: a Community Health Worker project in Uganda with a business incentive tied to it as well as a Voluntary Health Worker project in Nigeria focused on pregnant women. The second part of this program, goes beyond the traditional approaches and focus on women's participation in household production and decision-making, and increase exposure to important nutrition and hygiene interventions to study whether gender inequities is a barrier to improving children's health and malnutrition. All projects will be evaluated during the period 2017-2020 using a randomized controlled trial methodology and are expected to contribute to better understand how effective policies can be used to change the negative trend of children's health in the poorer part of the world.
more
|
|
43082
|
Research/scientific institutio...ns
more
|
9.5;3
|
IV.2. Other Multisector
|
51000
|
University, college or other t...eaching institution, research institute or think-tank
more
|
Handelshögskolan i Stockholm
|
|
|
