Sort by:

select Language:

NEW Laboratory testing for 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in suspected human cases

World Health Organization WHO, (2020)

The purpose of this document is to provide interim guidance to laboratories and stakeholders involved in laboratory testing of patients who meet the definition of suspected case of pneumonia associated with a novel coronavirus identified in Wuhan, China

NEW Infection prevention and control during health care when novel coronavirus (nCoV) infection is suspected

World Health Organization WHO, (2020)

This guidance is intended for health-care workers (HCWs), health-care managers, and teams working in infection prevention and control.

NEW Poster für Flughäfen, Informationen für Reisende

Robert-Koch-Institut RKI, (2020)

Erstellt unter Federführung des Gesundheitsamtes Frankfurt, Stand 24.1.2020

Global Surveillance for human infection with novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV)

World Health Organization WHO, (2020)

This document summarizes WHO recommendations for surveillance of the novel coronavirus (nCoV) recently identified in Wuhan, China (2019-nCoV). WHO will update these recommendations as new information becomes available on the situation.

Global Health Security (GHS) Index

Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI) and the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (JHU), Eds.: The Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), (2019)

The GHS Index is intended to be a key resource in the face of increasing risks of high-consequence and globally catastrophic biological events and in light of major gaps in international financing for preparedness. These risks are magnified by a rapidly changing and interconnected world; increasing political instability; urbanization; climate change; and rapid technology advances that make it easier, cheaper, and faster to create and engineer pathogens. Key findings from the study of 195 countries: • Out of a possible 100 points, the average GHS Index score across 195 countries was 40.2. • The majority of high- and middle-income countries do not score above 50. • Action is urgently needed to improve countries’ readiness for high-consequence infectious disease outbreaks.

Regional Ebola Preparedness Overview of Needs and Requirements June to December 2019

World Health Organization WHO, (2019)

This document presents a consolidated summary of urgent activities required to advance preparedness, as elaborated in each country's national plan, with a particular focus on Priority 1 countries. It presents the estimated requirements, needs, and gaps for each of the Priority 1 countries and a summary for Priority 2 countries, as aligned for the period of July to December 2019.

Investigation and public health management of people with possible Ebola virus disease infection

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control ECDC, (2019)

This document aims to provide guidance to EU/EEA public health authorities, public health professionals and healthcare practitioners for the management of persons having had contact with cases of Ebola virus disease (EVD) after visiting or working in an area that is affected by EVD; also covered is occupational exposure to the disease

A World at Risk

Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, (2019)

Annual report on global preparednessfor health emergencies The next pandemic is not a question of if, but when—and the world is woefully unprepared, according to the first annual report from the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board. The WHO and the World Bank convened the independent group after the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak in West Africa, Global News reports. Within 36 hours, a contagion like the 1918 flu could sweep the globe and take 50 to 80 million lives while wreaking havoc on the global economy, the report warns. And that’s just one possibility. What would it take to get prepared? An investment of $1-$2 per person per year could create “acceptable” level of preparedness.

359 hits